Turbidity meters either emit white light or has an infrared light source. To comply with EPA For most other applications an ISO specified design turbidity meter with an infrared light source can be used. Infrared light sources minimise or even eliminate the influence of colouration in a sample, whereas a white light source in a coloured solution would be inaccurate.
Today, there are three modern methods for measuring turbidity, and two for measuring total suspended solids. These methods have expanded the range and accuracy of turbidity measurements from basic object visibility tests and historical visual extinction methods 2.
However, each method has its advantages and limitations. Turbidity is caused by particles and colored material in water. It can be measured relative to water clarity, or directly with a turbidity instrument such as a turbidimeter or turbidity sensor. Turbidity sensors may also be referred to as submersible turbidimeters Water clarity methods involve a secchi disc or tube.
They are often quick and inexpensive, but are only as accurate as the person using them 1. Turbidity meters use nephelometry 90 degree scattering or other optical scatter-detection techniques for fast, accurate turbidity measurements on water samples.
Turbidity sensors also use optical technology, but instead of using sample cells, they can be placed directly in the water source to measure turbidity.
In addition, turbidity sensors can be used for continuous turbidity measurements 21,22, However, when using a meter or a sensor, most turbidity data are not inter-comparable. Thus differences in suspended sediment type e. These instruments can be convenient and accurate tools as long as consistency is maintained.
Total suspended solids TSS are the main cause of turbidity. The most common, and accurate, method of measuring suspended solids is by weight. To measure TSS, a water sample is filtered, dried, and weighed. This method is the most accurate technique for measuring total suspended solids, however it is also more difficult and time-consuming 3. The second method is a recent development by the U. Geological Survey. This organization has developed a technique for calculating suspended sediment from acoustic Doppler meter backscatter 4.
While this method is not as accurate as a weigh scale, it provides the opportunity for continuous suspended sediment measurements, just as turbidity sensors allow for continuous turbidity measurements. Total suspended solids can also be estimated from turbidity measurements, however, this requires linear regression modeling and must be re-calculated for each sampling period and location. No standard model exists due to the differences in stream flow, sediment concentration, and particle size 5.
As mentioned above, turbidity units have no inherent value. They are a qualitative, rather than a quantitative, measurement There is no standard conversion between various turbidity units e. Furthermore, clear water is not always healthy, and likewise turbid water does not necessarily indicate an issue.
Turbidity data must always be taken in context This means that it is important to consider the nature of suspended solids that are present, in the larger picture of the water system e. To this end, it is more often a change in turbidity that indicates an issue, such as the development of an algal bloom on a lake, or a steady increase in suspended sediment in a river due to a polluted tributary.
As a qualitative, contextual measurement, the variety of turbidity units in use can be confusing. Each measurement method uses a different unit. A multitude of turbidity units were introduced because a change in the type of light source, detector, or angle of measurement changes the turbidity reading.
In addition, mineral-based solids will reflect more light, while organic particles tend to absorb more light 5. These effects are based on the relationship between light wavelengths and beam width and particle size, color and concentration As such, different turbidity instruments can output various turbidity measurements even in the same sample While turbidity units can be approximately equal, to ensure accurate records, consistency in methods and instruments must be maintained.
Historically, units such as NTU and JTU were often erroneously interchanged because they were assumed to be equivalent 55, Many instrument manuals suggest using inappropriate units simply because they are more well known.
Which units should be used with which measurement method or instrument design can be found in the Quality Standards section. If the use of a particular unit is absolutely necessary, correlations between two turbidity instruments can be developed These calculated models can be used to convert between units and compare data from different instruments when using the same sample or same surface-water location Likewise, correlations can also be made between suspended sediment concentrations and turbidity measurements 5.
However, these calculated models are only adequate for the specific location where measurements were made. Surface waters are not static, and turbidity levels and sources will vary by location, season or other factors 51, Thus, in other bodies of water with changed particle type, size, and distribution, such conversions are no longer accurate New measurements must be taken to calculate a new conversion model for that location.
In purely mineral-based samples, this relationship is expressed through the following equation 29 :. When organic material, air bubbles or dissolved colored material is present, this equation can become inconsistent In addition, the accuracy of the correlation is based on a linear relationship between turbidity and suspended solids When the relationship becomes non-linear above 40 NTU for nephelometric methods , the equation is no longer suitable.
United States Geological Survey modeling uses streamflow data in addition to turbidity and suspended sediment measurements to calculate regression models. The USGS recommends using base logarithmic transformation to meet linear regression assumptions Transforming the data improves symmetry, linearity and normality, though it also requires a retransformation bias correction factor An example of a linear regression model through this method may look like:.
Once a regression model has been accepted, it can be used to predict suspended sediment concentrations The model should be re-analyzed and validated as necessary, based on the nature of the surface-water source. If a single linear regression model does not meet established criteria, a multiple regression model can be used Though no standardized formula exists, these calculated correlations can be useful in monitoring water quality Care should be taken when when establishing relationships between turbidity and suspended sediment as the values of both in a body of water may constantly change To further complicate turbidity measurements, there are several water quality standard methods and design standards in use.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency has approved eight standards for monitoring drinking water The United States Geological Survey uses, but does not require, some EPA-approved methods, as non-regulatory methods can be more accurate at higher turbidity levels The ADCP backscatter method is also gaining traction for monitoring total suspended solids specifically 4.
Of all of these methods, the EPA Method Outside of the U. The American Society for Testing of Materials considers several of these methods as appropriate and recommends instruments utilizing the respective technologies based on turbidity level 19, However, ASTM D is very specific about reporting procedures — units must indicate exactly which instrument design is being used 19, Other instrument-based methods for measuring turbidity include: light attenuation, surface scatter, and backscatter While turbidimeters and spectrophotometers using these designs exist, they do not comply with any of the above standards.
To ensure accurate reporting when using a ratiometric turbidity meter or backscatter-based turbidity sensor, the ASTM D unit reporting protocol should be referenced Method The standardized criteria attempt to ensure both accuracy and comparability between compliant meters Instruments in compliance with the EPA Method This method uses nephelometric technology, which measures light scatter at at degree angle from the initial light path The photodetector must be centered at that angle, and cannot extend more than 30 degrees from that center point.
To minimize differences in light scatter measurements, the method states that the incident and scattered light cannot travel more than 10 cm from the light source to the photodetector Additional photodetectors are permitted under this method, provided that the degree angle is the primary detector. EPA Method This means that the tungsten output is polychromatic, or broadband in spectrum.
When the light reaches the photodetector, the spectral peak response should be between nm. The use of a wide spectral band means that the turbidity meter may be affected by colored samples. As dissolved colored matter can absorb some wavelengths, the accuracy of the meter may decrease However, a broadband spectrum also allows the meter to be sensitive to smaller particles. This sensitivity means a tungsten lamp source will provide a more accurate response than a monochromatic light source when measuring a sample with very fine particles The use of a tungsten lamp as a light source requires a daily calibration check and frequent recalibration This is due to the incandescent decay inherent in the lamp.
As the lamp slowly burns out, much like any other incandescent light bulb, the light output will decrease as well, altering the measurement reading Frequent recalibration minimizes any errors due to light decay. These turbidity meters should have a resolution of 0. However, these turbidity meters will not be as accurate at turbidity levels above 40 NTU.
At higher levels, the relationship between light scatter and turbidity becomes non-linear. This means that the amount of scattered light that can reach the photodetector decreases, limiting the capabilities of the instrument Instead, these instruments are best used when monitoring treated water, as there is little color interference and limited turbidity.
The EPA Method Once the sample is diluted below 40 NTU and remeasured, the new reading is multiplied by the dilution factor to calculate the turbidity of the original sample This design standard attempts to ensure that turbidity sensors and meters in compliance with this method would have good repeatability and comparability Best known for its requirement of a monochromatic light source, ISO eliminates most color interferences However, there is some ambiguity and misdirection regarding instrument compliance in this area.
This method specifically requires a monochromatic light source at a wavelength of nm, with a spectral bandwidth of 60 nm While both LEDs and filtered tungsten filament lamps can be used as a monochromatic light source, they do not necessarily fall within the specified range. Near-IR, or near-infrared, encompasses the range of nm, beyond the specifications of ISO While the near-IR range meets the same goals for the restricted light source, reduced color interference and stray light error , it does not necessarily mean compliance Most instruments in compliance with this method use a nm LED light source Additional detection angles are allowed such as attenuation , but the nephelometric degree detector must be the primary measurement source.
This is a more precise requirement than the EPA Method Like EPA Method This range can be extended by diluting the sample until it falls below 40 NTU, and then multiplying by the dilution factor. Both EPA However, the differences in light source and the slight differences in design create different measurement results. ISO has the advantage that near-infrared light is rarely absorbed by colored particles and molecules, reducing error that would be present with a broadband light source Furthermore, LEDs tend to be more stable over time, requiring less calibration However, as longer wavelengths are less sensitive to small particles, ISO will produce slightly lower turbidity readings than EPA The Great Lakes Instrument Method 2 doubles the number of photodiodes and photodetectors used in the average turbidity instrument It also doubles the number of measurements taken.
As such, this design is also known as a modulated four-beam turbidimeter. By using two measurements, two light sources, and two detectors, this method can compare results between the detectors and cancel out errors This method requires nm LEDs, which allows for color compensation, much as the single beam ISO method does The LEDs alternate light pulses every half second.
The detector directly across from the active LED is considered the active signal, while the detector at a degree angle is considered the reference signal. Every half second, the active and reference signals switch as the second LED pulses Thus the GLI2 method provides two active and two reference measurements to determine each reading.
The ratiometric calculations used to determine turbidity mean that the light input and the output are directly proportional. Any errors that may appear are thus mathematically canceled out As fouling, sediment or color interference affect both detectors equally, any potential errors are nullified Based on the ratiometric directly proportional algorithms used to calculate turbidity, the GLI2 method allows for increased sensitivity and error cancellation in the NTU range However, this method loses some accuracy as turbidity levels rise above 40 NTU This is due to the the increased light intensity.
As turbidity increases, the intensity of the scattered light will also increase GLI2 instruments are ideal for lower turbidity ranges, and when measuring in the NTU range in particular, they are extremely accurate Instruments with this design are still classified under nephelometric technology as they use photodetectors at degree angles.
While it is also based on nephelometric technology 90 angle , Hach Method uses a laser light source as opposed to a tungsten lamp or infrared LED. It is not recommended for use when turbidity levels exceed 5. To be in compliance with this method, the laser diode must emit red light, with a wavelength between nm and nm As with the EPA Method The detector must be set at 90 degrees from the incident light path, and must be connected to a photomultiplier tube PMT via a fiber-optic cable Fiber-optic cables may also be used to carry light from the diode to the sample The PMT is used to increase the sensitivity of the photodetector.
This setup is also considered an in-line or on-line process stream method as it uses sample lines instead of a sample cell or a dynamic instrument in-situ turbidity sensor 18, With a laser diode as a light source, and photomultiplier tube connected to the detector, instruments in compliance with this method can detect extremely low turbidity levels Due to the heightened resolution of this method, units for this method are expressed as milli-Nephelometric Turbidity Units mNTU Unlike the previous methods, Hach Method is not used with turbidity sensors or meters.
It is designed for on-line, or process monitoring Instruments in compliance with this method are ideal at very low turbidity levels, such as monitoring drinking water or effluent from wastewater treatment plants While the two methods are often interchanged, most instruments and reporting procedures default to the EPA Method Specifically, each method requires a tungsten-filament lamp light source with a color temperature of K 16, They also both require the photodetector to be centered at 90 degrees, and not to stretch more than 30 degrees from that point.
But it's not at all simple and plain and it is vital for all life on Earth. Where there is water there is life, and where water is scarce, life has to struggle or just "throw in the towel. Water is nature is never really totally clear, especially in surface water, such as rivers and lakes.
Water has color and some extent of dissolved and suspended material, usually dirt particles suspended sediment. Suspended sediment is an important factor in determining the quality of water.
Water temperature plays an important role in almost all USGS water science. Water temperature exerts a major influence on biological activity and growth, has an effect on water chemistry, can influence water quantity measurements, and governs the kinds of organisms that live in water bodies. Water and electricity don't mix, right? Well actually, pure water is an excellent insulator and does not conduct electricity. The thing is, you won't find any pure water in nature, so don't mix electricity and water.
Our Water Science School page will give you all the details. The banner picture shows it all — Superhighways! Streets and pavement! House roofs!
These are all "impervious surfaces"; impervious to the water from precipitation. When it rains in this locale, water no longer seeps into the ground, but now runs off into storm sewers and then quickly into local creeks. Localized flooding is too often the result.
Here, a U. To gain knowledge of the suspended-sediment characteristics of the entire river water quality can vary greatly across a river , suspended-sediment water samples.
Skip to main content. Search Search. Water Science School. Turbidity and Water. Water Properties Information by Topic Learn more. Water Quality Information by Topic Learn more. Surface Water Information by Topic Learn more. Science Center Objects Overview Related Science Publications Multimedia Lucky for us all, our drinking water is almost always clear very low turbidity.
Below are other science topics associated with turbidity and water properties. Date published: October 22, Filter Total Items: 4.
0コメント